Pi-hole vs AdGuard Home: Which DNS Blocker Should You Use?
Two Tools, Same Goal
Both Pi-hole and AdGuard Home do the same fundamental thing: they act as a DNS sinkhole, blocking ads and trackers for every device on your network before they ever load. No per-device apps, no browser extensions — just point your router's DNS at the server and the whole house is protected.
I actually run both on my homelab. Here's what I've learned.
The Quick Verdict
If you want the short version:
- Choose Pi-hole if you love customization, community blocklists, and a proven track record.
- Choose AdGuard Home if you want a modern UI, built-in encrypted DNS, and the simplest possible setup.
Now the details.
Setup & Installation
Both are trivial to deploy with Docker. Here's Pi-hole:
services:
pihole:
image: pihole/pihole:latest
ports:
- "53:53/tcp"
- "53:53/udp"
- "80:80/tcp"
environment:
TZ: 'Europe/Athens'
WEBPASSWORD: 'changeme'
volumes:
- './etc-pihole:/etc/pihole'
restart: unless-stopped
And AdGuard Home:
services:
adguardhome:
image: adguard/adguardhome:latest
ports:
- "53:53/tcp"
- "53:53/udp"
- "3000:3000/tcp"
volumes:
- './work:/opt/adguardhome/work'
- './conf:/opt/adguardhome/conf'
restart: unless-stopped
Winner: Tie. Both take five minutes.
User Interface
This is where AdGuard pulls ahead for newcomers. Its dashboard is clean, modern, and everything is where you'd expect it. Pi-hole's interface is functional and information-dense, but it shows its age a little.
Winner: AdGuard Home.
Encrypted DNS (DoH / DoT)
AdGuard Home has DNS-over-HTTPS and DNS-over-TLS built in. With Pi-hole you need to add cloudflared or stubby as a separate piece. If encrypted upstream DNS matters to you, AdGuard saves a step.
Winner: AdGuard Home.
Blocklists & Customization
Pi-hole's ecosystem is enormous. Years of community blocklists, regex filtering, group management, and tools like Gravity Sync. If you love to tinker and fine-tune, Pi-hole gives you more levers to pull.
Winner: Pi-hole.
Stability & Track Record
Pi-hole has been around longer and is rock-solid. That's not to say AdGuard is unstable — it's very reliable — but Pi-hole has earned its reputation over many years on everything from Raspberry Pis to enterprise setups.
Winner: Pi-hole (slightly).
The Comparison Table
| Feature | Pi-hole | AdGuard Home |
|---|---|---|
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| UI/UX | Functional | Modern |
| Encrypted DNS | Add-on needed | Built-in |
| Blocklist ecosystem | Massive | Good |
| Parental controls | Via blocklists | Built-in |
| Customization depth | Very high | High |
| Resource usage | Tiny | Tiny |
| Track record | Longer | Newer but solid |
Which Do I Actually Use?
Here's my honest setup: I run both, with AdGuard Home as primary and Pi-hole as secondary DNS. This gives me redundancy — if I'm doing maintenance on one, the network stays protected by the other.
But if you forced me to pick one for someone just starting out? AdGuard Home. The built-in encrypted DNS and friendlier UI make it the better first experience. Pi-hole is the power user's choice once you want to go deeper.
The Bottom Line
You genuinely can't go wrong with either. Both block ads network-wide, both are free, both are lightweight enough to run on anything. Pick AdGuard for simplicity, Pi-hole for control — or run both like I do and stop worrying about it.